{
  "apiVersion": "v1",
  "kind": "Chapter",
  "metadata": {
    "generated": "2026-08-22T14:14:13Z",
    "language": "en",
    "book": "genesis-woh",
    "chapter": 12
  },
  "data": {
    "n": 12,
    "bookSlug": "genesis-woh",
    "bookCode": "GEN-WOH",
    "refId": "",
    "title": "Genesis 12 — The call of Abram and the descent to Mitsrayim",
    "translation": {"track":"translation","version":"1.0.0","sourceText":"Tanach with Ta'amei Hamikra (Westminster Leningrad)","sourceLicense":"Public Domain","sourceUrl":"http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml","sourceAccessedVia":"sefaria.org/api/v3/texts/Genesis.12","glossaryVersion":"2.9.0","modelDrafts":["claude-opus-4-7"],"reviewer":"zarazinsfuss","reviewedAt":"2026-05-22T18:30:00+00:00","status":"stable","reviewerReport":{"reviewer":"claude-opus-4-7 acting as woh-reviewer","reviewedAt":"2026-05-22T17:53:57Z","verdicts":[{"refId":"GEN-12:1","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Torah Commentary: Genesis (1989), p. 88","Alter, The Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 62","Hamilton, NICOT Genesis 1-17 (1990), pp. 370-371"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed Hebrew: qal imperative lekh + lamed-prefixed 2ms pronoun lekha. Dativus commodi/ethical-dative analysis is grammatically standard (cf. GKC sec. 119s; Joüon-Muraoka sec. 133d). Editor's \"Go forth\" intensifies bare \"go\" without committing to the reflexive-advantageous nuance, which is held in commentary. The 12:1 / 22:2 inclusio (Sarna, Alter) is uncontested. Translation defensible."},{"refId":"GEN-12:2","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 89","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 275"],"reasoning":"Four cohortative/imperfect clauses correctly parsed. The Babel-shem (Gen 11:4) intertextual reversal noted in commentary is a standard Sarna/Wenham observation. No translation question contested."},{"refId":"GEN-12:3","status":"approve","citations":["Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 277-278","Hamilton, NICOT (1990), pp. 373-375","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (Hermeneia, 1985 ET), pp. 151-152","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 89-90 and Excursus 8","Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 85-86"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וְנִבְרְכ֣וּ is unambiguously niphal (perfect waw-consecutive, 3mp) at MT 12:3 — niphal at 12:3, 18:18, 28:14 and hithpael at 22:18, 26:4 is a documented MT distinction. The Editor's verse-by-verse MT-fidelity approach is the position of Wenham and Hamilton; Sarna/Speiser/NJPS favor consistent middle/reflexive across all five but acknowledge the MT pointing. The Pauline reception (Gal 3:8) supports the passive translation in the Christian tradition. The choice is defensible. Flagged as a load-bearing policy commitment binding chs 18, 22, 26, 28 — see report flag."},{"refId":"GEN-12:4","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 90"],"reasoning":"Narrative-bridge verse; Editor correctly omits commentary. Translation matches ASV/NRSV/NJPS consensus. The 75-year datum is preserved as the text gives it. No interpretive choice required."},{"refId":"GEN-12:5","status":"approve","citations":["Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), p. 87","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 155","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 91","BDB s.v. עָשָׂה, p. 794 (sense of acquire/produce)"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: הַנֶּפֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר־עָשׂוּ — the lexical oddness of 'asah governing nefesh is real. Editor's decision to preserve literal \"made\" matches ASV and honors the oddness rather than smoothing to NJPS \"acquired\" (Speiser/Sarna/Westermann reading) or Rashi's proselyte reading. The three-way philological dispute is accurately reported."},{"refId":"GEN-12:6","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. אֵלוֹן, p. 18 / אֵלָה II / אַלּוֹן","HALOT 1:51 (elon: oak or terebinth, terminological uncertainty)","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 154-155","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 91"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: אֵל֣וֹן מוֹרֶ֑ה. The botanical question (oak vs. terebinth) is genuinely contested in HALOT/BDB and the Editor's ASV \"oak\" is one of two defensible choices. The Moreh-from-yarah (teacher/oracle) etymology is standard philology (BDB s.v. מוֹרֶה II); the sacred-tree-oracle pattern (Deut 11:30, Gen 35:4, Gen 35:8, Josh 24:26, Judg 6:11, Judg 9:6, 9:37) is correctly assembled. The inferred classification fits — the verse names a place; the function is scholarly inference."},{"refId":"GEN-12:7","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 156-158","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 92","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 280","Hamilton, NICOT (1990), pp. 378-380"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וַיֵּרָא is niphal imperfect (waw-consec) of r-a-h, mediopassive. \"Appeared\" is the standard rendering across all major English versions (ASV, NJPS, NRSV, NIV). The seven-word zera-eretz promise nucleus and its 11 patriarchal expansions is uncontested philology. The Editor's commentary note that the chapter \"does not editorialize\" on mode-of-seeing is appropriate; the brief lens-touch (referencing chs 1-11 register) sits in commentary, not in translation."},{"refId":"GEN-12:8","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 92-93","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 159","BDB s.v. קָרָא 4, p. 895 (\"call upon the name of\")"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וַיִּקְרָא בְּשֵׁם יְהוָה — qal imperfect (waw-consec). The cult-site invocation formula linking back to Gen 4:26 and forward to 13:4, 21:33, 26:25 is uncontested. \"Called on the name of YHWH\" matches ASV consistency with the rendering of the formula across the corpus."},{"refId":"GEN-12:9","status":"approve","citations":["GKC sec. 113s-u (doubled infinitive absolute for continuous action)","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 93","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 64"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: הָל֥וֹךְ וְנָס֖וֹעַ — paired infinitives absolute. Editor's \"going and journeying\" preserves the doubled construction (GKC sec. 113s); ASV \"going on still\" is one valid alternative. The Negev geography is uncontested."},{"refId":"GEN-12:10","status":"approve","citations":["Alter, The Art of Biblical Narrative (1981, expanded ed. 2011), ch. 3 \"Biblical Type-Scenes and the Uses of Convention\"","Sternberg, The Poetics of Biblical Narrative (1985), pp. 365-440","Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 91-92","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 160-165","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 93"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וַיֵּרֶד אַבְרָם מִצְרַיְמָה — qal imperfect (waw-consec) of yarad + directional he. The Mitsrayim-going-down idiom (Gen 39:1, 46:3, Deut 26:5; reversed in Exod aliyah pattern) is standard philology. Type-scene framing as Alter's synthesis is correctly classified as inferred. Translation is uncontested."},{"refId":"GEN-12:11","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. יָפֶה, p. 421","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 94","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 65"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: אִשָּׁה יְפַת־מַרְאֶה — construct phrase, fem adj construct + noun. The \"beauty-formula\" recurrences across Sarai, Rebekah, Rachel, Joseph, Abigail, Tamar, Bathsheba, Abishag, Vashti, Esther are uncontested intertextual facts. Editor's rendering preserves construct structure over modern smoothings."},{"refId":"GEN-12:12","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 94"],"reasoning":"Narrative-bridge verse; Editor correctly omits commentary. Translation matches ASV/NJPS/NRSV consensus. \"They will kill me and let you live\" — uncontested."},{"refId":"GEN-12:13","status":"approve","citations":["Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 91-92","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 163-164","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 94-95","Hamilton, NICOT (1990), pp. 384-386","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), pp. 65-66"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: אִמְרִי־נָא אֲחֹתִי אָתְּ — fem sg qal imperative ('mr) + politeness particle + noun + 2fs pronoun. Editor's \"Say, please, that you are my sister\" preserves all four elements in defensible modern register. The three-way ethics dispute (morally-compromised / apologetic-rabbinic / defensive-tactical) accurately reported. Direct classification defensible: the strategy and the documented reading-tradition are uncontested."},{"refId":"GEN-12:14","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 95"],"reasoning":"Narrative-bridge verse; Editor correctly omits commentary. Translation matches ASV/NJPS/NRSV. The beauty-formula echo to v 11 (yafah me'od) is preserved."},{"refId":"GEN-12:15","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 95","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 165"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: שָׂרֵי פַרְעֹה — plural construct of sar. \"Officers of Pharaoh\" is a defensible rendering; ASV \"princes\" is equally valid (BDB s.v. שַׂר, p. 978). The grammatical passive vatuqqach observation is correct."},{"refId":"GEN-12:16","status":"approve","citations":["Sapir-Hen and Ben-Yosef, \"The Introduction of Domestic Camels to the Southern Levant: Evidence from the Aravah Valley,\" Tel Aviv 40 (2013): 277-285","Finkelstein and Silberman, The Bible Unearthed (2001), pp. 36-38","Köhler-Rollefson, \"Camels and Camel Pastoralism in Arabia,\" Biblical Archaeologist 56/4 (1993): 180-188","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 96"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: seven-item inventory; the camel (g'mallim) is the documented anachronism. Sapir-Hen and Ben-Yosef 2013 is the decisive archaeological study; Finkelstein-Silberman 2001 the popular-scholarly summary. Editor's inferred classification is correct — the camel-as-anachronism is a scholarly inference from external archaeology, not a claim of the text. Translation renders the item straight; the editorial discussion lives in commentary, where it belongs."},{"refId":"GEN-12:17","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 96 and Excursus on Gen 12:10-20 as proto-Exodus","Garbini, History and Ideology in Ancient Israel (1988), pp. 76-79","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 165-166","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 67","BDB s.v. נָגַע, p. 619 (piel: smite, plague)","HALOT 2:668 s.v. נֶגַע"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וַיְנַגַּע piel imperfect (waw-consec) of n-g-' + cognate noun n'ga'im g'dolim. The verbal link to Exod 11:1 ('od nega 'echad) is exact and well-documented in Sarna and Garbini. Editor's inferred classification of the proto-Exodus typology is correct — the verbal parallel is direct, the typological-redactional reading is scholarly synthesis. Translation \"afflicted ... great plagues\" preserves the cognate."},{"refId":"GEN-12:18","status":"approve","citations":["Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 67","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 96","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 166"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: מַה־זֹּאת עָשִׂיתָ לִּי — interrogative mah + demonstrative + qal pf 2ms + dative. The Gen 3:13 echo (mah-zot 'asit) is noted by Alter and Sarna and is a recognized rebuke-formula intertext. Pharaoh-as-agent-of-moral-truth-telling observation is a standard Westermann/Alter reading."},{"refId":"GEN-12:19","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 97"],"reasoning":"Narrative-bridge verse; Editor correctly omits commentary. Translation matches ASV/NJPS/NRSV consensus. The rebuke completes Pharaoh's speech; the take-and-go dismissal anticipates v 20."},{"refId":"GEN-12:20","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 96-97","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 166","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 67","BDB s.v. שָׁלַח piel, p. 1018 (send off, dismiss, expel)","Garbini, History and Ideology in Ancient Israel (1988)"],"reasoning":"Re-parsed: וַיְשַׁלְּחוּ piel imperfect (waw-consec) of sh-l-ch. The verbal identity with Exod 6:1 (y'shalchem), 11:1 (y'shalach), 12:33 (l'shalcham) is exact and documented in Sarna. Editor's inferred classification of the proto-Exodus expulsion-verb typology is correct: the verbal parallel is direct, the typological synthesis is scholarly."}],"glossaryReview":[{"glossary_id":"lekh-lekha","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 88","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 62","GKC sec. 119s (dativus commodi)"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The ethical-dative construction and the 12:1 / 22:2 inclusio are uncontested philological-literary facts. Three-position dispute fairly reported."},{"glossary_id":"nivrakhu-bekha-niphal-hithpael","status":"approve","citations":["Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 277-278","Hamilton, NICOT (1990), pp. 373-375","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 151-152","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), Excursus 8"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct: the MT niphal/hithpael distinction across the five verses is a textual fact, and the three-position scholarly dispute is fairly reported. WoH choice (verse-by-verse MT fidelity) is the Wenham/Hamilton position and is defensible. Reviewer notes this is a forward-binding policy commitment for chs 18, 22, 26, 28 — flagged for human ratification, not for revision."},{"glossary_id":"nefesh-asher-asu","status":"approve","citations":["Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), p. 87","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 155","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 91"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The lexical oddness of 'asah governing nefesh is real; the three-way reading dispute (proselytes / slaves-acquired / dependents) is documented across rabbinic, modern-critical, and translation traditions. Preservation of literal \"made\" honors oddness."},{"glossary_id":"elon-moreh","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. מוֹרֶה II, p. 435","HALOT 1:51 (elon)","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 154-155","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 91"],"reasoning":"Inferred classification correct: Moreh-from-yarah and the sacred-tree-oracle pattern is a scholarly assembly from cognate occurrences, not an explicit claim of v 6. The pattern is well-attested in Westermann, Sarna, and the Deut 11:30 / Judg 9:37 parallels."},{"glossary_id":"va-yera-yhwh-theophany","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. רָאָה niphal, p. 906","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 156-158","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 92"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The patriarchal-theophany formula and its seven occurrences (12:7, 17:1, 18:1, 26:2, 26:24, 35:9, 48:3) are uncontested facts of the text. \"Appeared\" matches every major English version. Mode-of-seeing held for commentary at 18:1 — defensible."},{"glossary_id":"zera-eretz-promise","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 157-158","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 92 and Excursus on the land-promise","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 63"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The seven-word promise-nucleus and its 11 patriarchal expansions are uncontested. Preserving \"seed\" over \"offspring\"/\"descendants\" maintains the agricultural metaphor that recurs across the corpus and into the Psalter."},{"glossary_id":"qara-b-shem-yhwh","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. קָרָא 4, p. 895","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 92-93","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 159"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The cult-site-invocation formula linking Gen 4:26 to the patriarchal altar-sites (12:8, 13:4, 21:33, 26:25) is uncontested. Editor's appliesTo list is appropriate."},{"glossary_id":"wife-sister-type-scene","status":"approve","citations":["Alter, The Art of Biblical Narrative (1981, exp. 2011), ch. 3","Sternberg, The Poetics of Biblical Narrative (1985)","Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 91-92","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 160-165"],"reasoning":"Inferred classification correct: Alter's type-scene synthesis is a 20th-century literary-critical framework, not an explicit claim of the text. Three instances (Gen 12 / 20 / 26) are direct facts; the framing is inferential. The broad 40-verse appliesTo scope is forward-binding for translation-consistency at chs 20 and 26 — flagged for human ratification, not for revision. Locking the vocabulary convention now is editorially correct."},{"glossary_id":"eshet-yefat-mareh","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. יָפֶה, p. 421","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 94","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 65 and notes on Gen 29:17 and 39:6"],"reasoning":"Direct classification correct. The yefat-mar'eh / tovat-mar'eh formula and its 13 occurrences across Genesis, Samuel, Kings, and Esther are uncontested intratextual facts. Preserving the construct structure (\"beautiful of appearance\") over modern smoothing is the right call."},{"glossary_id":"imri-na-achoti-at","status":"approve","citations":["Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 91-92","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 94-95","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 163-164","Hamilton, NICOT (1990), pp. 384-386"],"reasoning":"Direct classification defensible. The strategy, its recurrence (20:2, 20:12, 26:7), and the three-way ethics dispute are uncontested in the scholarly literature. The translation preserves the polite-imperative + na + sister-claim structure faithfully. If the project later decides ethics-disputes should be classified inferred, the rationale text does not change — only the label."},{"glossary_id":"camel-anachronism","status":"approve","citations":["Sapir-Hen and Ben-Yosef, Tel Aviv 40 (2013): 277-285","Finkelstein and Silberman, The Bible Unearthed (2001), pp. 36-38","Köhler-Rollefson, Biblical Archaeologist 56/4 (1993): 180-188"],"reasoning":"Inferred classification correct: the camel-as-anachronism is a scholarly inference from archaeological evidence external to the text. Sapir-Hen and Ben-Yosef 2013 is the decisive recent study. The appliesTo scope across nine patriarchal occurrences is appropriate."},{"glossary_id":"nega-pharaoh-proto-exodus","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 96 and Excursus on Gen 12:10-20 as proto-Exodus","Garbini, History and Ideology in Ancient Israel (1988), pp. 76-79","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 165-166","Alter, Five Books of Moses (2004), p. 67"],"reasoning":"Inferred classification correct: the verbal parallel to Exod 11:1 is direct, but the proto-Exodus typological reading (composed-late, modeled-on-Exodus, redactional prefiguration) is scholarly synthesis. The Garbini / Crüsemann / Sarna citations are real and the synthesis is widely held. Flagged for human attention only insofar as the project may prefer to classify the verbal-parallel-itself as direct — defensible either way."},{"glossary_id":"va-y-shalchu-expulsion","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 96-97","BDB s.v. שָׁלַח piel, p. 1018","Garbini, History and Ideology in Ancient Israel (1988)"],"reasoning":"Inferred classification correct on the same grounds as nega-pharaoh-proto-exodus: the verbal identity between Gen 12:20 and Exod 6:1 / 11:1 / 12:33 is direct, but the typological synthesis is scholarly. Translation preserves the cognate verb. Same notation as nega-pharaoh: defensible either way as direct or inferred."}],"lens-leakage-flags":[]}},
    "segments": [],
    "lines": [],
    "paragraphs": [{
        "n": 1,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:1",
        "text": "YHWH said to Abram, \"Go forth from your land, from your kindred, and from your father's house, to the land that I will show you."
      },{
        "n": 2,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:2",
        "text": "I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and I will make your name great; and you shall be a blessing."
      },{
        "n": 3,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:3",
        "text": "I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse; and in you all the families of the ground shall be blessed."
      },{
        "n": 4,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:4",
        "text": "Abram went as YHWH had spoken to him, and Lot went with him; and Abram was seventy-five years old when he went out from Haran."
      },{
        "n": 5,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:5",
        "text": "Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all the substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had made in Haran; and they went out to go to the land of Canaan, and to the land of Canaan they came."
      },{
        "n": 6,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:6",
        "text": "Abram passed through the land to the place of Shechem, to the oak of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land."
      },{
        "n": 7,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:7",
        "text": "YHWH appeared to Abram and said, \"To your seed I will give this land.\" And he built there an altar to YHWH who had appeared to him."
      },{
        "n": 8,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:8",
        "text": "He moved on from there to the hill country east of Bethel and pitched his tent, with Bethel on the west and Ai on the east; and he built there an altar to YHWH and called on the name of YHWH."
      },{
        "n": 9,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:9",
        "text": "Abram journeyed on, going and journeying toward the Negev."
      },{
        "n": 10,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:10",
        "text": "There was a famine in the land, and Abram went down to Mitsrayim to sojourn there, for the famine was heavy in the land."
      },{
        "n": 11,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:11",
        "text": "As he drew near to enter Mitsrayim, he said to Sarai his wife, \"Behold now, I know that you are a woman beautiful of appearance."
      },{
        "n": 12,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:12",
        "text": "And it shall come to pass that when the Mitsrim see you, they will say, 'This is his wife,' and they will kill me and let you live."
      },{
        "n": 13,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:13",
        "text": "Say, please, that you are my sister, so that it may go well with me on your account, and my soul shall live because of you."
      },{
        "n": 14,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:14",
        "text": "When Abram entered Mitsrayim, the Mitsrim saw the woman, that she was very beautiful."
      },{
        "n": 15,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:15",
        "text": "The officers of Pharaoh saw her and praised her to Pharaoh, and the woman was taken into the house of Pharaoh."
      },{
        "n": 16,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:16",
        "text": "And he treated Abram well on her account; and he had sheep and cattle and male donkeys and male slaves and female slaves and female donkeys and camels."
      },{
        "n": 17,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:17",
        "text": "YHWH afflicted Pharaoh and his house with great plagues on account of Sarai, the wife of Abram."
      },{
        "n": 18,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:18",
        "text": "Pharaoh called Abram and said, \"What is this you have done to me? Why did you not tell me that she is your wife?"
      },{
        "n": 19,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:19",
        "text": "Why did you say, 'She is my sister,' so that I took her for myself as a wife? Now then, here is your wife — take her and go."
      },{
        "n": 20,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-12:20",
        "text": "Pharaoh commanded men concerning him, and they sent him away with his wife and all that he had."
      }
    ]
  },
  "links": {
    "self": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/chapters/12",
    "book": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/",
    "chapters": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/chapters/",
    "library": "/v1/library/",
    "schema": "/v1/schema/book/"
  }
}