{
  "apiVersion": "v1",
  "kind": "Chapter",
  "metadata": {
    "generated": "2026-08-22T14:14:13Z",
    "language": "en",
    "book": "genesis-woh",
    "chapter": 15
  },
  "data": {
    "n": 15,
    "bookSlug": "genesis-woh",
    "bookCode": "GEN-WOH",
    "refId": "",
    "title": "Genesis 15 — The covenant between the pieces and the promise of the land",
    "translation": {"track":"translation","version":"1.0.0","sourceText":"Tanach with Ta'amei Hamikra (Westminster Leningrad)","sourceLicense":"Public Domain","sourceUrl":"http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml","sourceAccessedVia":"sefaria.org/api/v3/texts/Genesis.15","glossaryVersion":"2.12.0","modelDrafts":["claude-opus-4-7"],"reviewer":"zarazinsfuss","reviewedAt":"2026-05-23T10:00:00+00:00","status":"stable","reviewerReport":{"reviewer":"claude-opus-4-7 acting as woh-reviewer","reviewedAt":"2026-05-23T00:00:00Z","verdicts":[{"refId":"GEN-15:1","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 220","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 112","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 326","BDB 539 (magen); BDB 4236 (machazeh)"],"reasoning":"Independently re-read MT: the davar-YHWH + ba-machazeh + anokhi magen lakh triad is grammatically explicit. The English (After these things the word of YHWH came to Abram in a vision, saying: Fear not, Abram; I am your shield, your reward is exceedingly great) is ASV-matching and defensible. The verse-as-inaugural-prophetic-formula reading is Westermann/Sarna/Wenham consensus."},{"refId":"GEN-15:2","status":"approve","citations":["Speiser, Anchor Bible Genesis (1964), pp. 111-112","Skinner, ICC Genesis (1910), p. 279","HALOT s.v. meshek, ben-meshek"],"reasoning":"The Adonai-YHWH compound is grammatically explicit; the masoretic qere perpetuum is documented in Gesenius §17c. The ben-meshek beyti hapax is a well-known textual crux; the WoH rendering (the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus) matches ASV without preempting the dispute, which is correctly flagged in commentary rather than in the English."},{"refId":"GEN-15:3","status":"approve","citations":["ASV (1901) parallel"],"reasoning":"Narrative-bridge verse; ASV-direct rendering of the Hebrew. No glossary attachments needed, none made."},{"refId":"GEN-15:4","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. meʻeh (bowels, internal organs); ASV parallel"],"reasoning":"The recurrence of the davar-YHWH formula within the chapter is grammatically explicit. The mi-meekha rendering (out of your own bowels) is literal and ASV-matching. Defensible."},{"refId":"GEN-15:5","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; existing glossary entry patriarchal-seed-comparison-triad (v2.10.0)"],"reasoning":"The va-yotze otokh ha-chutzah + count-the-stars is ASV-direct. The seed-comparison-triad cross-reference to Gen 13:16 (dust) + 22:17 (sand) is appropriately handled via existing glossary."},{"refId":"GEN-15:6","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 539 (aman hiphil: to consider firm, support oneself on, trust)","HALOT s.v. अמן; s.v. חשב; s.v. צדקה","Moberly, The Old Testament of the Old Testament (1992), pp. 195-216","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 222-223","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), pp. 113-114","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 329-330","Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (1977)","Dunn, WBC Romans 1-8 (1988); Wright, Paul and the Faithfulness of God (2013); Westerholm 2004; Cranfield ICC Romans (1975)"],"reasoning":"INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF LOAD-BEARING ENTRY. The Hebrew is rendered faithfully: heʼemin (hiphil of aman) as believed-in; va-yachshebeha as reckoned-it; tzedakah as righteousness. The 3fs antecedent ambiguity is preserved. Critically, the English (and he believed in YHWH; and he reckoned it to him for righteousness) is ASV-matching and carries NO forensic-imputation language; it could be lifted into any modern scholarly translation and pass unremarked. The Pauline reception (Rom 4:3, 4:9, 4:22; Gal 3:6; James 2:23) is correctly flagged-not-preempted; the Reformation superstructure is named as downstream. Moberly 1992 supports the Hebrew-on-its-own-terms reading. The glossary entry achieves genuine compliance with hard rule 6, not merely formal compliance. The translation is defensible as scholarly work independent of the WoH project."},{"refId":"GEN-15:7","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; existing glossary handling of Ur Kasdim"],"reasoning":"I am YHWH, who brought you out of Ur of the Kasdim is ASV-direct. The Kasdim transliteration is consistent with chapter convention."},{"refId":"GEN-15:8","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 114 on the petitionary register"],"reasoning":"The second occurrence of the Adonai-YHWH compound is grammatically explicit; the ba-mah eda interrogative is ASV-direct."},{"refId":"GEN-15:9","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 223-225","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 330-331","BDB s.v. shilesh (meshulleshet)"],"reasoning":"The eglah meshulleshet form is debated (three-years-old vs. threefold/three-of); ASV reads three-years-old, which the WoH translation follows. Either reading is defensible; the WoH choice tracks ASV/NRSV/NJPS majority. The animal-list inventory is grammatically explicit."},{"refId":"GEN-15:10","status":"approve","citations":["Weinfeld 1970, JAOS 90, pp. 184-203","Hillers, Covenant (1969)","McCarthy, Treaty and Covenant 2nd ed (1978), pp. 91-105","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 224-225"],"reasoning":"The va-y-vater + va-yiten ish bitro liqrat reʻehu bisection ritual is ASV-direct. The brit-bein-ha-betarim ritual context is correctly attached via glossary; ANE parallels in the entry are verifiable. The birds-not-divided detail (cf. Lev 1:17 sacrificial convention) is preserved."},{"refId":"GEN-15:11","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. ayit (bird of prey, collective); ASV parallel"],"reasoning":"The ayit/pgarim/va-yashev sequence is ASV-direct. The hiphil drove-them-away is grammatically explicit."},{"refId":"GEN-15:12","status":"approve","citations":["Lichtenstein 1968, JANES 1","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 226","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 332","BDB 8639 (tardemah); HALOT s.v. תרדמה"],"reasoning":"INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF LENS-RELEVANT VERSE. The tardemah naflah al-Avram and eymah chashekhah gedolah constructions are grammatically explicit. The English (a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, a horror of great darkness fell upon him) is ASV-matching with no WoH-distinctive vocabulary; no anaesthesia/sedation/technology language intrudes. The cross-corpus tardemah chain (Gen 2:21, 1 Sam 26:12, Job 4:13/33:15, Isa 29:10) is correctly housed in the glossary apparatus. Lens posture verified clean."},{"refId":"GEN-15:13","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Exodus (1991), excursus 2, pp. 254-256","Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt (1997), pp. 124-126","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 227"],"reasoning":"The infinitive-absolute emphatic yadoʻa tedaʻ (know-of-a-surety) and the ger-yihyeh-zarakha + 400-shanah construction are ASV-direct. The 400/430 chronology dispute is correctly housed in the glossary entry without adjudication in the English."},{"refId":"GEN-15:14","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 227"],"reasoning":"The dan-anokhi (I-will-judge) and yetzʼu bi-rkush gadol (come-out-with-great-substance) are ASV-direct. Exodus-foreshadow well-attested across Sarna/Wenham/Hamilton."},{"refId":"GEN-15:15","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. seyvah (good-old-age); ASV parallel"],"reasoning":"The patriarchal-good-death formula tikkaver b-seyvah tovah is ASV-direct and lexically standard."},{"refId":"GEN-15:16","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 227-228","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 116","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 333","BDB s.v. shalem (qal: complete, whole)"],"reasoning":"The dor reviʻi + lo-shalem avon ha-Emori construction is grammatically explicit. The WoH not-yet-complete (vs ASV not-yet-full) renders the shalem root sense slightly more literally; defensible. The Deut 9:4-5 / Lev 18:24-28 / Lev 20:23 conquest-theology cross-references and the 1 Thess 2:16 reception are correctly housed in glossary, flagged-not-preempted."},{"refId":"GEN-15:17","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 228-229","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 332-333","von Rad, Genesis OTL (1972), p. 187","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 117","Hamilton, NICOT Genesis 1-17 (1990), pp. 437-440","BDB s.v. tanur, ashan, lappid, esh"],"reasoning":"INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF HIGHEST-LENS-LEVERAGE VERSE. The tanur ashan v-lappid esh asher avar bein ha-gezarim ha-eleh is grammatically explicit. The English (a smoking furnace, and a flaming torch that passed between these pieces) is ASV-matching. NO WoH cosmological vocabulary intrudes: no craft, no propulsion, no engineering language; the imagery is preserved literally. The unilateral-divine-passage reading (only YHWH passes; Abram is in tardemah) is genuine modern-critical consensus (Westermann, Wenham, von Rad, Sarna, Hamilton). The fire-theophany cross-references (Exod 19:18 Sinai, Exod 13:21 pillar-of-fire, Isa 6:4, Ezek 1) are correctly housed in glossary. Lens posture verified clean."},{"refId":"GEN-15:18","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 3772 (karat: cut down, cut off; with brit: make a covenant by cutting in two)","Weinfeld 1970, JAOS 90","Fitzmyer, The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefire (1995), KAI 222-224 on the gzr ʻdyʼ Aramaic cognate","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 230-231","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 117"],"reasoning":"The ba-yom ha-hu karat YHWH et-Avram brit construction is grammatically explicit. The WoH choice cut-a-covenant (rather than ASV/KJV made-a-covenant) is the one English divergence from ASV in the chapter; it is etymologically defensible via the Aramaic gzr ʻdyʼ Sefire cognate, BDB 3772, and Weinfeld 1970. The maximal Mitsrayim-to-Euphrates land-claim is grammatically explicit; the geography is preserved literally."},{"refId":"GEN-15:19","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 230","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 334","BDB s.v. qedem (Qadmoni etymology)"],"reasoning":"The Qeini/Qenizi/Qadmoni triad is grammatically unique to this verse; the Qadmoni-from-qedem (eastern-ones) etymology is the standard scholarly reading. Transliterations match the chapterʼs gentilic convention."},{"refId":"GEN-15:20","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; existing glossary entry refaim-giant-peoples (v2.11.0)"],"reasoning":"The Chitti/Perizi/Refaʼim substring is grammatically explicit. The Refaʼim substitution for Chivi (vs the standard six-fold list) links to the existing v2.11.0 giant-peoples glossary entry."},{"refId":"GEN-15:21","status":"approve","citations":["ASV parallel; Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 230"],"reasoning":"The Emori/Kenaʻani/Girgashi/Yevusi tail of the ten-nations list is grammatically explicit; transliterations consistent."}],"glossaryReview":[{"glossary_id":"davar-yhwh-prophetic-formula","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Basic Forms of Prophetic Speech (1967)","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 220","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 112"],"reasoning":"The va-y-hi devar-YHWH formula is grammatically explicit at Gen 15:1; the 250+ cross-corpus distribution is verifiable by lexical search. The inaugural-status reading is mainstream-scholarly consensus. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"machazeh-prophetic-vision","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 4236 (machazeh)","HALOT s.v. מחזה","Lindblom, Prophecy in Ancient Israel (1962)"],"reasoning":"The four-occurrence distribution (Gen 15:1; Num 24:4, 16; Ezek 13:7) is verifiable. The distinction from chazon/marʻeh/chizayon is documented in BDB and HALOT. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"magen-shield-of-abram","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 4043 (magen)","Eichrodt, Theology of the Old Testament vol I (1961), pp. 192-194","Kraus, Psalms 1-59 (1988)"],"reasoning":"The recurrence-set across Deut 33:29, 2 Sam 22 / Ps 18, Ps 3/28/33/84/115/144, Prov 30:5 is verifiable by lexical search. The magen-of-the-fathers epithet is mainstream Psalms-commentary material. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"adonai-yhwh-divine-name","status":"approve","citations":["Gesenius §17c; Joüon-Muraoka §16f","Zimmerli, Ezekiel I Hermeneia (1979), pp. 36-40","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 113"],"reasoning":"The masoretic qere perpetuum is documented in the standard grammars. The Gen 15:2, 8 patriarchal occurrences are grammatically explicit; the Ezekielian 200+ recurrence is verifiable. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"aman-tzedakah-counted-as-righteousness","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 539 (aman hiphil); BDB s.v. chashav; BDB s.v. tzedakah","Moberly, The Old Testament of the Old Testament (1992), pp. 195-216","Sanders, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (1977)","Dunn, WBC Romans 1-8 (1988)","Wright, Paul and the Faithfulness of God (2013)","Westerholm, Perspectives Old and New on Paul (2004)","Cranfield, Romans ICC (1975)"],"reasoning":"LOAD-BEARING ENTRY VERIFICATION. The Hebrew lexical core (heʼemin/yachshebeha/tzedakah) is grammatically explicit. The Pauline reception (Rom 4, Gal 3, James 2) is named as downstream-Greek-and-Latin and is genuinely flagged-not-preempted: the entry does not adjudicate between traditional and New Perspective readings, cites Sanders/Dunn/Wright alongside Cranfield/Westerholm, and notes the James 2:23 opposite-use complication. Moberly 1992 supports the Hebrew-on-its-own-terms reading. The entry achieves genuine compliance with the lens-posture discipline. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"brit-bein-ha-betarim","status":"approve","citations":["Weinfeld 1970, JAOS 90, pp. 184-203","Mendenhall, Law and Covenant in Israel and the ANE (1955)","Hillers, Covenant (1969)","McCarthy, Treaty and Covenant 2nd ed (1978), pp. 91-105","Fitzmyer, The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefire BibOr 19A (1995)","Wiseman, The Alalakh Tablets (1953) for AT 1, 76"],"reasoning":"ANE PARALLELS VERIFICATION. The Mari ARM II 37, II 80 references (Old Babylonian, qatal hayyari ritual) are documented in the Archives Royales de Mari series and discussed in Weinfeld 1970. The Alalakh AT 1 (Idrimi-era treaty) and AT 76 (Late Bronze) are in Wiseman 1953. Sefire KAI 222-224 with the kma zy yqd ʻglʼ znh curse-formula is in Fitzmyer 1995. The Esarhaddon vassal-treaty animal-bisection imagery is in Wiseman SAA 2. The Jer 34:18-20 cross-reference is direct in-Bible material. The unilateral-divine-passage reading is Westermann/Wenham/von Rad/Sarna/Hamilton consensus. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"tardemah-divine-induced-deep-sleep","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 8639 (tardemah); HALOT s.v. תרדמה","Lichtenstein 1968, JANES 1 (Dream-Theophany and the E Document)","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 226"],"reasoning":"CROSS-CORPUS LENS-RELEVANT ENTRY VERIFICATION. The six-occurrence chain (Gen 2:21, 15:12, 1 Sam 26:12, Job 4:13, 33:15, Isa 29:10) is verifiable by lexical search. The divine-causation pattern is documented in BDB/HALOT/Lichtenstein. The LXX rendering as ekstasis is verifiable in Rahlfs Septuaginta. The lens-posture is held: the entry does NOT editorialize on what the underlying phenomenon is (anaesthesia/sedation/technology); that material is deferred to wiki. claim_type=direct is correct. The retention of the pre-existing chapter-2 narrower tardemah entry alongside this cross-corpus entry is editorially clean."},{"glossary_id":"400-years-affliction-prophecy","status":"approve","citations":["Sarna, JPS Exodus (1991), excursus 2, pp. 254-256","Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt (1997), pp. 124-126","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 227-228","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 332-333"],"reasoning":"CHRONOLOGY DISPUTE VERIFICATION. The four chronological witnesses (Gen 15:13ʼs 400; Gen 15:16ʼs 4-generations; MT Exod 12:40ʼs 430; SP/LXX Exod 12:40ʼs 430-split) are each grammatically/textually explicit. The SP/LXX harmonization reading is in the standard text-critical apparatuses (BHS, BHQ Exodus). The NT receptions (Acts 7:6 / Gal 3:17) are direct textual evidence. The entry presents the dispute without adjudication, correctly. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"avon-ha-emori-iniquity-not-yet-complete","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. shalem (qal); BDB s.v. avon","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 227-228","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 116","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 333"],"reasoning":"The lo-shalem avon ha-Emori cup-of-iniquity formula is grammatically explicit. The Deut 9:4-5 / Lev 18:24-28 / Lev 20:23 conquest-theology cross-references are direct in-Bible material. The 1 Thess 2:16 Pauline reception is correctly flagged-not-preempted; the entry notes the anti-Judaic polemical history without endorsing it (Beker 1980, Donfried 1993 cited as modern critical re-evaluations). The Emori-as-synecdoche reading is well-attested (Josh 24:15, 18; Amos 2:9). claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"tanur-ashan-lappid-esh-theophany","status":"approve","citations":["BDB s.v. tanur, ashan, lappid, esh","Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), pp. 228-229","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), pp. 332-333","von Rad, Genesis OTL (1972), p. 187","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 117","Hamilton, NICOT Genesis 1-17 (1990), pp. 437-440"],"reasoning":"HIGHEST-LENS-LEVERAGE ENTRY VERIFICATION. The four lexemes (tanur, ashan, lappid, esh) are each grammatically explicit at Gen 15:17. The fire-and-smoke theophany pattern across Exod 19:18 (Sinai), Exod 13:21 (pillar-of-fire), Isa 6:4, Ezek 1 is verifiable by lexical search. The unilateral-divine-passage reading is genuine Westermann/Wenham/von Rad/Sarna/Hamilton consensus. CRITICAL: the entry stays in mainstream-scholarly register; no Wheel of Heaven cosmological reading is inserted, the lens-relevant material is summarized but not editorialized, and the developed WoH reading is explicitly deferred to downstream wiki and long-form material. The entry could be lifted into a credentialed Hebrew Bible commentary apparatus and pass unremarked. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"karat-brit-cut-covenant","status":"approve","citations":["BDB 3772 (karat) + 1285 (brit)","Weinfeld 1970, JAOS 90","Fitzmyer 1995 on Sefire KAI 222-224 gzr ʻdyʼ Aramaic cognate"],"reasoning":"The standard Hebrew covenant-cutting idiom is grammatically explicit at Gen 15:18 and across the 80+ cross-corpus occurrences. The verb-literal cut (vs the smoothed make) is etymologically defensible and preserves the link to the ritual described in the same chapter. The Aramaic gzr ʻdyʼ Sefire cognate is direct documentary evidence for the West-Semitic shared idiom. Alter 2004 reads sealed and NJPS reads made; the WoH cut is at the etymologically-most-literal end of the spectrum and is justified by the chapterʼs ritual context. claim_type=direct is correct."},{"glossary_id":"ten-nations-of-canaan","status":"approve","citations":["Westermann, Genesis 12-36 (1985), p. 230","Sarna, JPS Genesis (1989), p. 117","Wenham, WBC Genesis 1-15 (1987), p. 334","BDB s.v. qedem (Qadmoni etymology)"],"reasoning":"The ten-fold list is grammatically explicit at vv 19-21 and uniquely maximal in the Hebrew Bible. The Qeini/Qenizi/Qadmoni triad is unique to this passage; the Qadmoni-from-qedem etymology is the standard scholarly reading. The substitution of Refaʼim for Chivi vs the standard six-fold list (Exod 3:8, 13:5, 23:23, 33:2, 34:11) is editorially significant and verifiable. The matching of the maximal ten-fold list to the maximal Euphrates land-claim of v 18 is Westermann/Sarna/Wenham consensus. The documentary-hypothesis redactional reading is mainstream. claim_type=direct is correct."}],"lens-leakage-flags":[]}},
    "segments": [],
    "lines": [],
    "paragraphs": [{
        "n": 1,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:1",
        "text": "After these things the word of YHWH came to Abram in a vision, saying: Fear not, Abram; I am your shield, your reward is exceedingly great."
      },{
        "n": 2,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:2",
        "text": "And Abram said: Lord YHWH, what will you give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?"
      },{
        "n": 3,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:3",
        "text": "And Abram said: Behold, to me you have given no seed, and, lo, one born in my house is my heir."
      },{
        "n": 4,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:4",
        "text": "And, behold, the word of YHWH came to him, saying: This man shall not be your heir; but he that shall come forth out of your own bowels shall be your heir."
      },{
        "n": 5,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:5",
        "text": "And he brought him forth abroad, and said: Look now toward the heavens, and count the stars, if you are able to count them; and he said to him: So shall your seed be."
      },{
        "n": 6,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:6",
        "text": "And he believed in YHWH; and he reckoned it to him for righteousness."
      },{
        "n": 7,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:7",
        "text": "And he said to him: I am YHWH, who brought you out of Ur of the Kasdim, to give you this land to inherit it."
      },{
        "n": 8,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:8",
        "text": "And he said: Lord YHWH, by what shall I know that I shall inherit it?"
      },{
        "n": 9,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:9",
        "text": "And he said to him: Take me a heifer three years old, and a she-goat three years old, and a ram three years old, and a turtle-dove, and a young pigeon."
      },{
        "n": 10,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:10",
        "text": "And he took to him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each half over against the other; but the birds he did not divide."
      },{
        "n": 11,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:11",
        "text": "And the birds of prey came down upon the carcasses, and Abram drove them away."
      },{
        "n": 12,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:12",
        "text": "And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, a horror of great darkness fell upon him."
      },{
        "n": 13,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:13",
        "text": "And he said to Abram: Know of a surety that your seed shall be a sojourner in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years."
      },{
        "n": 14,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:14",
        "text": "And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge; and afterward shall they come out with great substance."
      },{
        "n": 15,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:15",
        "text": "But you shall go to your fathers in peace; you shall be buried in a good old age."
      },{
        "n": 16,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:16",
        "text": "And in the fourth generation they shall come hither again; for the iniquity of the Emori is not yet complete."
      },{
        "n": 17,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:17",
        "text": "And it came to pass, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold, a smoking furnace, and a flaming torch that passed between these pieces."
      },{
        "n": 18,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:18",
        "text": "On that day YHWH cut a covenant with Abram, saying: To your seed have I given this land, from the river of Mitsrayim unto the great river, the river Perat."
      },{
        "n": 19,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:19",
        "text": "The Qeini, and the Qenizi, and the Qadmoni,"
      },{
        "n": 20,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:20",
        "text": "and the Chitti, and the Perizi, and the Refa'im,"
      },{
        "n": 21,
        "refId": "GEN-WOH-15:21",
        "text": "and the Emori, and the Kena'ani, and the Girgashi, and the Yevusi."
      }
    ]
  },
  "links": {
    "self": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/chapters/15",
    "book": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/",
    "chapters": "/v1/library/books/genesis-woh/chapters/",
    "library": "/v1/library/",
    "schema": "/v1/schema/book/"
  }
}